All legal proceedings in Saudi Arabia are treated as confidential, and we are prohibited from disclosing details of disputes in which we have acted unless such details have otherwise become public. Cases in which we have recently been involved include the following:
We were recently involved in the first successful challenge to a resolution by the Saudi Arabian Capital Markets Authority under the Capital Market Regulation of 2003 and the Market Conduct Regulation 2004. The Capital Market Authority had brought an action against the CEO of SADAFCO, a listed company, in respect of statements made to a journalist from Reuters, which statements were subsequently misquoted in an article based on the interview. The Committee for the Resolution of Securities Disputes accepted the plea that the Capital Markets Authority's action against SADAFCO's CEO was unfounded since no misconduct was proven, and accordingly set aside the Capital Markets Authority's decision.
We represented an insurance company and its reinsurers in a US$29 million property loss and business interruption claim.
We are conducting several test cases before the newly established Committee for the Settlement of Insurance Disputes, involving a variety of issues including the Committee's jurisdiction.
We provided expert advice on Saudi Arabian law issues in offshore court proceedings involving disputed amounts in excess of US$100 million.
We represent several shipowners and their liability insurers in a series of marine environmental damage test cases, the first such cases under the new Saudi Arabian environmental legislation, which entered into force in October 2003. The first two judgments in these cases were entered in favour of clients in 2008.
We advised a port operator in a successful salvage claim involving a ship and cargo with a combined value in excess of US$120 million.
We advised a major international contracting company in connection with the successful settlement of a substantial construction dispute.
We provided expert advice on Saudi Arabian law to Euler Hermes in Euler Hermes UK PLC v. Apple Computer BV [2006] EWCA Civ 375.
English Court of Appeal Judgment 4th April 2006
  iflr button  
 

Chambers Global 2010

 
  This independent Jeddah-based team earns consistently high praise for the breadth and depth of its finance practice ... Described as "consistently excellent and always dedicated," this firm easily handles the large deals that come its way while maintaining the quality, personalised service that overseas clients have come to expect ... As one of the country's top independent powerhouses, this firm draws in work directly from big-name foreign clients, as well as plenty of disputes referrals from the main international players.
Go to Website ...
 
  iflr button  
 

IFLR 1000, 2010 edition

 
  With local associations in such high demand from international firms it is getting rarer to find a truly independent domestic law office in the jurisdiction. In light of this it is impressive that Hatem Abbas Ghazzawi & Co (formerly aligned with Hammad Al-Mehdar & Co) retains its prominence in the market.
Go to Website ...
 
   
  European Legal 500,
2009 edition
 
 

Not being tied to any one particular relationship, unlike many other firms in the country, enables the firm to work effectively on a non-exclusive basis, with any number of foreign law firms.
Go to website ...


 
      saudilegal 2010